HomeWorkCase study

Case study · Elevator company · USA

monday.com ERP Audit and Rebuild: 25 Automations: 14 automations on paper.
Zero live. Now 25.

An elevator company's documentation said 14 automations were live on monday.com. A four-day audit found none. The rebuild delivered 25 automations across 9 boards, live-tested including the cross-board cases.

Result
0 live automations found, 25 delivered
Build time
4-day audit, then build, Jun to Aug 2026
Industry
Elevators
Shipped
Aug 2026
  • monday.com
  • Make.com
  • Slack
Illustration of the rebuilt monday.com ERP: a projects board with Engineering, Manufacturing and Field service status columns, billed jobs moved to inactive, a toast confirming job 1043 synced to Contacts and Field Service, and an elevator floor panel whose lit buttons are the job stages under a display showing the job’s current stage

0 of 14

documented automations were actually live before the audit

25

automations delivered across 9 boards, live-tested with real records

4 days

fixed-fee audit before a single automation was built

How it runs

One job, one record, every board in step

  1. 01monday.com

    Audit

    Four days, fixed fee: every planned automation mapped to the process it serves, what exists and what is worth building

  2. 02monday.com

    Quote won

    A won quote creates the project, so the job starts as one record

  3. 03Make.com

    Sync

    Field Service, Manufacturing and Engineering keep their stages in sync with the Contacts board

  4. 04Make.com

    Roll up

    Completion dates roll up to the project, and each role gets its own board view

  5. 05Slack

    Close

    A billed job moves to inactive; purchase-order and deal-won alerts reach the right people

The audit

Four days to find out what was really running

The documentation listed 14 to 15 automations as live. The fixed-fee audit checked every one against the boards and found none running, then mapped each planned automation to the process it serves before anything was built.

  • Documented before the audit: 14 to 15
  • Live before the audit: 0
  • Delivered after it: 25 across 9 boards
Row names are illustrative; the audit document stays with the client.

Native or Make.com

One rule decides where each automation lives

Native monday.com automations handle single-board rules. Make.com handles cross-board sync, rollups and anything that touches an outside system such as Slack. Native was preferred wherever it could do the job, so the new dependency stays small, documented and monitored.

  • Stage sync across three boards and Contacts
  • Completion date rollups
  • Slack purchase-order and deal-won alerts

Role views

Each team works its own view of the same record

Engineering, Manufacturing and Field Service each get a board view built for their role, and every view reads the same job record, including the case where one contact has several jobs.

  • Role-specific views
  • Cross-board record identity
  • One contact, several jobs
Jobs and sites are illustrative.

An elevator company's documentation said 14 automations were live on monday.com. A four-day audit found none. The rebuild delivered 25 automations across 9 boards, live-tested with real records including the cross-board cases where one contact has several jobs. Native monday.com automations where they fit, Make.com where they do not.

Built by Prem Patel, Make Level 5 Expert and Zapier Certified Professional; Nex Automations is listed in both official partner directories. This is one of the 1,200+ systems we have shipped, and the case we point to when a client asks why we audit before we build.

The situation

A US elevator and field-service company was moving from an old CRM to monday.com and had documentation saying 14 or 15 automations were already running. The audit found none of them were live. Nothing was wrong with any single board. The problem was the gaps between them: quotes, orders, installation and service lived in separate boards with people carrying the record between them.

A migration had been declared done on paper.

The 3 problems

  1. Documentation without reality. Fourteen automations existed in a document and zero in the account.
  2. Boards without a spine. Contacts, Field Service, Manufacturing and Engineering did not know about each other.
  3. Nobody could see the whole job. A won quote, its installation and its service history were three unrelated records.

What was built

Audit first: four days, fixed fee. Every planned automation mapped to the business process it served, with what existed, what did not and what was worth building.

How it flows

  1. A won quote creates the project
  2. Three boards (Field Service, Manufacturing, Engineering) keep their stages in sync with the Contacts board
  3. Completion dates roll up to the project
  4. A billed job moves the record to inactive
  5. Purchase-order alerts and deal-won notices go to the right people in Slack
  6. Each role gets its own board view

Native monday.com automations handle single-board rules. Make.com handles cross-board sync, rollups and anything touching an outside system.

Tools used

  • monday.com boards, views and native automations
  • Make.com for cross-board sync, rollups and the Slack integration
  • Slack for purchase-order and deal-won alerts

Results

MeasureValue
Automations documented before the audit14 to 15
Automations actually live before the audit0
Audit duration4 days, fixed fee
Automations delivered25 across 9 boards
TestingLive records, including one contact with several jobs
Time savedNot yet measured

The team now has an ERP they can see and change themselves, on tools they already pay for.

Honest limits

  • Time saved is not yet measured, so no hours or money figure appears here.
  • A monday.com-native ERP suits a company that already lives in monday.com. We would not move a company onto it for this alone.
  • Cross-board sync through Make.com adds a dependency the team did not have before. It is documented and monitored, and the native automations were preferred wherever they could do the job.

Related guides

FAQ

Q: Should I audit my monday.com automations before adding more? A: Yes. In this case the documentation claimed 14 live automations and the audit found zero. A four-day audit produced the map the build then followed.

Q: When do you use Make.com instead of monday.com's own automations? A: Native automations for single-board rules; Make.com for cross-board sync, rollups and anything that touches an outside system like Slack or a CRM.

Q: Can monday.com work as an ERP for an elevator company? A: For an elevator and field-service company that already runs on monday.com, yes: quotes, projects, manufacturing, engineering and service stages can be kept in sync across boards with role-specific views, which is what this rebuild delivered.

Q: How long does a monday.com automation rebuild take? A: This one was a four-day audit followed by a build of 25 automations across 9 boards, live-tested with real records. Scope depends on the number of boards and the cross-board cases.

Told your automations are live and not sure they are?

Four days of audit tells you what exists, what does not and what is worth building.

Book a free consult →

Get the written plan before you commit

Process inventory, platform decision per workflow, cost bands. Fixed fee, credited against the build.

Nex Automations is an automation studio led by Prem Patel, a Make.com Level 5 Expert, Make Silver Solution Partner and Zapier Solution Partner, based in Ahmedabad and working globally. 1,200+ automations built for 210+ clients across 8+ industries in 12+ countries.

  • Book the auditThe fit-check takes two minutes. Prem reads every one and replies within 24 hours.
  • Automation AuditProcess inventory, platform decision per workflow and cost bands, delivered as a written plan.
  • Book a free consult30 minutes to scope the process you want automated.

More from Nex Automations